An article in Plant Methods from Jose A Fernandez-Gallego (2018)

Wheat ear counting in-field conditions: High throughput and low-cost approach using RGB images.

Jose A. Fernandez‑Gallego, Shawn C. Kefauver1* , Nieves Aparicio Gutiérrez, María Teresa Nieto‑Taladriz and José Luis Araus.

Abstract

Background: The number of ears per unit ground area (ear density) is one of the main agronomic yield components in determining grain yield in wheat. A fast evaluation of this attribute may contribute to monitoring the efficiency of crop management practices, to an early prediction of grain yield or as a phenotyping trait in breeding programs. Currently, the number of ears is counted manually, which is time-consuming. Moreover, there is no single standardized protocol for counting the ears. An automatic ear‑counting algorithm is proposed to estimate ear density under field conditions based on zenithal color digital images taken from above the crop in natural light conditions. Field trials were carried out at two sites in Spain during the 2014/2015 crop season on a set of 24 varieties of durum wheat with two growing conditions per site. The algorithm for counting uses three steps: (1) a Laplacian frequency filter chosen to remove low and high-frequency elements appearing in an image, (2) a Median filter to reduce high noise still present around the ears and (3) segmentation using Find Maxima to segment local peaks and determine the ear count within the image.

Gif 1seg

 

Results: The results demonstrate high success rate (higher than 90%) between the algorithm counts and the manual (image‑based) ear counts, and precision, with a low standard deviation (around 5%). The relationships between algorithm ear counts and grain yield were also significant and greater than the correlation with manual (field‑based) ear counts. In this approach, results demonstrate that automatic ear counting performed on data captured around anthesis correlated better with grain yield than with images captured at later stages when the low performance of ear counting at late grain filling stages was associated with the loss of contrast between canopy and ears.

Conclusions: Developing robust, low‑cost and efficient field methods to assess wheat ear density, as a major agro‑ nomic component of yield, is highly relevant for phenotyping efforts towards increases in grain yield. Although the phenological stage of measurements is important, the robust image analysis algorithm presented here appears to be amenable from aerial or other automated platforms.

Keywords: Digital image processing, Ear counting, Field phenotyping, Laplacian frequency filter, Median filter, Find maxima, Wheat

Available from:

DOI: 10.1186/s13007-018-0289-4

Research Gate:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323869100_Wheat_ear_counting_in-field_conditions_High_throughput_and_low cost_approach_using_RGB_images 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s